Prevention Of Surgical Site Infection Research Articles

Contribution of the patient microbiome to surgical site infection and antibiotic prophylaxis failure in spine surgery.

Despite modern antiseptic techniques, surgical site infection (SSI) remains a leading complication of surgery. However, the origins of SSI and the high rates of antimicrobial resistance observed in these infections are poorly understood. Using instrumented spine surgery as a model of clean (class I) skin incision, we prospectively sampled preoperative microbiomes and postoperative SSI isolates in a cohort of 204 patients. Combining multiple forms of genomic analysis, we correlated the identity, anatomic distribution, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of SSI pathogens with those of preoperative strains obtained from the patient skin microbiome. We found that 86% of SSIs, comprising a broad range of bacterial species, originated endogenously from preoperative strains, with no evidence of common source infection among a superset of 1610 patients. Most SSI isolates (59%) were resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic administered during surgery, and their resistance phenotypes correlated with the patient's preoperative resistome (P = 0.0002). These findings indicate the need for SSI prevention strategies tailored to the preoperative microbiome and resistome present in individual patients.

The Impact of an Evidence-Based Bundle on Cesarean Section-Related Surgical Site Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Objective To compare the effectiveness of an evidence-based bundle in minimizing cesarean section (CS)-related surgical site infections (SSIs) with that of standard routine care. Methods This was a single-center, parallel, and randomized clinical trial conducted at KAHER’s Dr. Prabhakar Kore Charitable Hospital, Belagavi, India, from January 2021 to December 31, 2021. Three hundred twenty women undergoing CS delivery were selected and allocated into two groups (1:1) using simple randomization with fixed allocation. An evidence-based surgical bundle (a combination of more than three perioperative interventions) was used for the interventional group, whereas the control group received routine standard perioperative care. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI (superficial, deep, and organ or space SSIs) within 6 weeks postpartum in both groups. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05. Results In this study, 16 and 17 participants each from the control and intervention groups, respectively, were lost to follow-up, resulting in a total of 144 and 143 study participants included in the respective groups. Twenty-eight (19.4%) and 14 (9.7%) women developed SSI in the control and intervention groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common cause of SSI in both groups (63.6% (7/11) and 100% (3/3) in the control and intervention groups, respectively). Conclusion The use of the evidence-based bundle for CS-related SSI prevention effectively decreased the incidence of SSI by half compared to standard routine practice. Implementing the use of this bundle in routine perioperative care will reduce the cost of CS and improve health outcomes in CSs. Trial registration Clinical Trials Registry-India (www.ctri.nic.in). Registration number: CTRI/2020/11/029246.

Outcomes of Purse-string versus Conventional Linear Suture Closure of the Skin Wound following Ileostomy Reversal

Background: Intestinal stomas are made in a variety of settings and their reversal is also a routine surgery. Due to their clean, contaminated nature, there is a high risk of surgical site infection post-operatively. The objective of this study is to determine the difference in outcomes in two different techniques of skin closure after stoma reversal
 Methods: The study was conducted at department of general surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, over a period of six months. Seventy-one patients who underwent ileostomy reversal surgery in an elective setting were assigned two groups randomly: 34 in Group A and 37 in Group B. The group A patients underwent purse string closure for stoma site skin wound, whereas patients in group B underwent conventional linear closure. Time taken for surgery was noted and the patients were followed over one month period for development of any surgical site infection or dog-ear deformity.
 Results: The incidence of surgical site infection was 8.8% in the purse string closure group compared to 43.2 % in the linear closure group. Seven patients in group B developed dog ear deformities, whereas no such case was noted in Group A.
 Conclusions: Purse string closure is an effective and applicable technique for the closure of skin wounds after stoma reversal surgery. It is comparatively better in terms of prevention of surgical site infection as well as dog ear deformity in the closure of skin wounds after ileostomy reversal.

Surgical Site Infection Prevention Strategies in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background: Cardiac surgery becomes one of surgical procedure that has potential for develop several complications including surgical site infection (SSI). Despite the case is still very common, SSI can be regarded as the most preventable, especially when the treatment approach used, because there are many risk factors associated with the target. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of interventions strategies used to reduce the incident of SSI in cardiac surgery. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines provide a standardized framework for conducting and reporting systematic reviews. A comprehensive search was conducted across major electronic databases, The following database were PubMed, Scopus and ProQuest. The inclusion criteria were clinical and a randomized control trial published between 2018 to 2023. The primary outcome measure was SSI rates. Results: The studies encompassed diverse perioperative intervention strategies, such as pre operative nasal ointment, pre operative showering and shaving, chlorhexidine mouthwash, and negative pressure therapy. In total, 436.762 articles regarding SSI prevention strategies in cardiac surgery were found in this study. However, around 7 articles that were met with the criteria of this study. Conclusion: Actions to reduce the incidence of SSI are carried out at all perioperative stages. The action taken was modifying the intervention and also using additional therapy carried out by health workers.

The Effectiveness of Perioperative Nursing Interventions for Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Orthopedic Surgery.

The Effectiveness of Perioperative Nursing Interventions for Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Orthopedic Surgery.

Patients' Experience and Satisfaction Regarding the Pre-Operative Shower: The PRODOUCH Multicenter Descriptive Survey.

Background: Patients' experience of the pre-operative shower remains poorly assessed in the literature although it is an essential step in the prevention of surgical site infection. For obese patients, a pre-operative shower could be challenging. The goal was to assess patient satisfaction and experience with the process of pre-operative shower, and the effect of obesity status. Patients and Methods: This study was a multicenter prospective survey of consecutive surgical patients from nine hospitals. Data on the pre-operative shower were collected via telephone interview two to four weeks after surgery, and included the place (hospital, home), time, information received, difficulties experienced, the presence or absence of a visual assessment of skin cleanliness by a healthcare professional after the pre-operative shower, and overall patient satisfaction with the pre-operative shower technique. Data on the surgical procedure and patients' characteristics were collected from patients' records, and included age, gender, and body mass index. Factors associated with patient satisfaction were assessed. Results: Among 430 patients, 91.6% declared having received information on the pre-operative shower and 94.8% were very or rather satisfied with the pre-operative shower. Two factors were independently associated with satisfaction: showering at home and having received information on the pre-operative shower, but not obesity status. Only 17% of patients reported a visual assessment of skin cleanliness by a healthcare professional after the pre-operative shower. Discussion: Overall, regardless of obesity status, patients were satisfied with the pre-operative shower and reported no difficulties. However, this survey highlights the fact that skin cleanliness was seldom assessed by healthcare professionals, which may represent an unidentified weakness in skin preparation before surgery.

“In My Experience…Top Ten Steps for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection after Joint Arthroplasty”

Prevention strategies can help orthopedic surgeons optimize circumstances to reduce the incidence of SSI and PJI.

The effect of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads and Medical Optimization Clinic attendance on the acute surgical site infection rate in high-risk pediatric neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis patients.

Neuromuscular and syndromic (NMS) scoliosis patients are at higher risk of acute surgical site infections (SSIs). Despite following POSNA's endorsed consensus-based guidelines for SSI prevention, our institutional rates of acute SSI have varied dramatically. This variability drove simultaneous strategies to lower SSI rates: the creation of a preoperative Medical Optimization Clinic (MOC) and use of antibiotic-impregnated (Abx-I) calcium sulfate beads. Patients undergoing index PSF at a single institution between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with ≥ 2 risk factors were included: (1) BMI < 18.5 or > 25; (2) incontinence; (3) instrumentation to pelvis; (4) non-verbal; (5) GMFCS IV/V. SSI was defined as deep infection within 90days. We compared patients who attended MOC and received Abx-I (MOC + Abx-I) to those receiving neither intervention (control) nor a single intervention. 282 patients were included. The overall infection rate was 4.26%. Higher GMFCS (p = 0.0147), non-verbal status (p = 0.0048), and longer fusions (p = 0.0298) were independently associated with infection rate. Despite the MOC + Abx-I group having larger Cobb angles (88° ± 26°), higher GMFCS levels (4.5 ± 0.9), ASA class (3 ± 0.4), and more frequent instrumentation to the pelvis (85%), they had the lowest infection rate (2.13%) when compared to the control (4.2%) or single intervention groups (5.7%, 4.6%) (p = 0.9). The study examined the modern infection rate of NMS patients following the implementation of two interventions: MOC and Abx-I. Despite having higher risk factors (curves (88°), GMFCS level (4.5), ASA class (3), higher % instrumentation to the pelvis (85%)), the patients treated with both interventions demonstrated the lowest infection rate (2.13%).

Safety and Effectiveness of Triclosan-Coated Polydioxanone (PDS Plus) versus Uncoated Polydioxanone (PDS II) Sutures for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection after Hypospadias Repair in Children: A 10-Year Single Center Experience with 550 Hypospadias.

Triclosan is an antiseptic substance that has been shown in preclinical studies to reduce bacterial load in the wound and slow bacterial growth by inhibiting fatty acid synthesis. It is claimed that the coating protects against colonization of the tissue around the suture. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of triclosan-coated polydioxanone versus uncoated polydioxanone sutures for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) following hypospadias repair in children. The medical records of 550 children who underwent hypospadias repair between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients included in the study were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of the patients in whom polydioxanone (PDS II) was used (n = 262), while in the patients of the second group (n = 288), triclosan-coated polydioxanone (PDS Plus) was used for hypospadias repair. Secondary outcomes were defined as the occurrence of early and late complications, the number of readmissions within 30 days after surgery (ReAd), unplanned return to the operating room (uROR), and repeat operations. The median age of all children enrolled in the study was 16 (IQR 14, 20) months. The patients in whom PDS Plus was used for hypospadias repair had a significantly lower number of SSIs than the patients in whom PDS II was used (n = 18 (6.9%) vs. n = 4 (1.4%), p < 0.001). Wound infection led to wound dehiscence in 10 of 18 patients from the PDS II group, while all four wound infections from the PDS Plus group led to wound dehiscence (p = 0.07). The number of postoperative urethrocutaneous fistulas was significantly lower in the patients in whom PDS Plus was used (13.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.042). The incidence of late complications did not differ between the study groups: meatal stenosis (p = 0.944), residual chordee (p = 0.107), urethral stricture (p = 0.196), scarring (p = 0.351) and urinary discomfort (p = 0.713). There were no cases of uROR in either group. The ReAd rate was low in both groups (n = 5 (1.9%) vs. n = 2 (0.6%), p = 0.266). The frequency of reoperations was lower in the group of patients treated with PDS Plus than in the group of patients treated with PDS II (11.1% vs. 20.6%; p = 0.03). The use of PDS Plus in hypospadias surgery significantly reduces the incidence of SSI, postoperative fistulas, and reoperation rates compared to PDS II.

The Effect of Topical Vancomycin Powder Application on the Rate of Intervertebral Fusion Following Lumbar Fusion: A Retrospective Study

PurposeThe occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) after lumbar spinal fusion is a serious complication. Therefore, an increasing number of clinicians are applying vancomycin powder topically in the surgical field to reduce the incidence of SSI. However, there is concern that topical vancomycin powder application may affect intervertebral fusion. The purpose of this study was to analyse the effect of clinically-relevant topical vancomycin doses on the rate of intervertebral fusion after lumbar fusion and to further investigate the effect of vancomycin powder on the prevention of SSI. MethodsThe clinical data of 192 patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease admitted from January 2019 to June 2022, all of whom underwent posterior lumbar fusion, were retrospectively analysed. According to the infection prevention protocol, they were divided into a vancomycin group and a control group (no vancomycin), and the vancomycin group was sub-divided into 0.5 g, 1.0 g, and 1.5 g vancomycin groups. General information and surgical evaluation indexes were compared between the control and vancomycin groups and intervertebral fusion was compared between the vancomycin groups at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. ResultsThe rate of SSI in the vancomycin group was 0.0%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.3%, P < 0.05), and intervertebral fusion was good in all three vancomycin groups at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, with no statistically-significant differences (P > 0.05). ConclusionTopical application of 0.5 g, 1.0 g, or 1.5 g vancomycin powder did not affect the rates of intervertebral fusion after lumbar fusion. In addition, topical application of vancomycin powder significantly reduced the rates of SSI.

Care Bundles in Surgical Site Infection Prevention: A Narrative Review

Abstract Purpose of Review Surgical site infections are healthcare-associated infections that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Best practices in prevention of these infections are combined in care bundles for consistent implementation. Recent Findings Care bundles have been used in nearly all surgical specialties. While the composition and size of bundles vary, the effect of a bundle depends on the number of evidence-based interventions included and the consistency of implementation. Bundles work because of the cooperation and collaboration among members of a team. Bundles for prevention of surgical site infections should address the multiple risk factors for infection before, during, and after the surgery. Summary Bundles increase standardization of processes and decrease operative variance that both lead to reductions in surgical site infections.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for prevention of deep surgical site infections following primary total joint replacement

BackgroundThe use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) as a mean for preventing deep surgical site infections (SSI) after total joint replacement is controversial. Therefore, we have conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prophylactic effect of ALBC for SSI prevention in patients undergoing arthroplasty. This study was conducted to revise treatment guidelines for MRSA infections in Japan. MethodsPubMed (Medline), Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched for relevant articles comparing preventive effect of ALBC for patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty by August 2022. Primary outcome was the incidence of deep SSI. Subgroup analyses by type of surgery (total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty) and by causative pathogen (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)) were performed. ResultsOf the 3379 studies identified for screening, six studies involving 5745 patients were included. The use of ALBC significantly reduced the incidence of deep SSI in overall patients (risk ratio [RR] 0.60, 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.39–0.92), but the evidence level was very low. There was no significant preventive effect for ALBC compared with non-ALBC in both THA and TKA (THA, RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.23–1.16; TKA, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.38–1.06), and for preventing MRSA-SSI (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.03–2.41). ConclusionsAlthough the overall preventive effect of ALBC was significant, the evidence level was very low. Thus, the routine use of ALBC as a mean to prevent SSI in arthroplasty may not be suggested.

Silver carboxylate-TiO2/polydimethyl siloxane is a safe and effective antimicrobial with significant wound care potential.

With the rise in antibiotic resistance, new methodologies are needed to combat musculoskeletal infections. Silver is an antimicrobial that can be synthesized in different forms, but its pharmacokinetics are difficult to control. This study details the antibacterial efficacy and cellular cytotoxicity of a formulation consisting of silver carboxylate (AgCar) released through a titanium dioxide/polydimethylsiloxane matrix with a predictable release profile on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacterium baumannii, and human-derived primary osteoblasts. Through an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and IRB-approved protocol, AgCar was applied to live Yucatan porcine skin and histologically analyzed for skin penetration. Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (GFAAS) was used to measure elution of AgCar. Dose-response curves were generated through optical density to assess potency. Finally, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was used to quantify the cellular cytotoxicity of the novel formulation. The results were subject to statistical analysis using analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests. The silver carboxylate coating demonstrated deep penetration into the epithelium at the level of the deep pilosebaceous glands in animal models. GFAAS testing demonstrated the extended elution profile of silver carboxylate over 96 hours, while 100% silver with no titanium dioxide-polydimethylsiloxane matrix fully eluted within 48 hours. 10x silver carboxylate demonstrated superior antimicrobial activity to antibiotics and other silver formulations and showed minimal cytotoxicity compared with other silver formulations. Current antimicrobial therapies in wound care and surgical antisepsis, such as chlorhexidine gluconate, have pitfalls including poor skin penetration and short duration of efficacy. The broad antimicrobial activity, extended elution, and deep skin penetration of this AgCar formulation show great promise for surgical site infection and wound care treatment. Novel technology to fight the growing threat of microbial resistance should be at the forefront of orthopaedic surgical site infection prevention and treatment.

Intraoperative Wound Irrigation for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy

Surgical site infections frequently occur after open abdominal surgery. Intraoperative wound irrigation as a preventive measure is a common practice worldwide, although evidence supporting this practice is lacking. To evaluate the preventive effect of intraoperative wound irrigation with polyhexanide solution. The Intraoperative Wound Irrigation to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy (IOWISI) trial was a multicenter, 3-armed, randomized clinical trial. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention. The clinical trial was conducted in 12 university and general hospitals in Germany from September 2017 to December 2021 with 30-day follow-up. Adult patients undergoing laparotomy were eligible for inclusion. The main exclusion criteria were clean laparoscopic procedures and the inability to provide consent. Of 11 700 screened, 689 were included and 557 completed the trial; 689 were included in the intention-to-treat and safety analysis. Randomization was performed online (3:3:1 allocation) to polyhexanide 0.04%, saline, or no irrigation (control) of the operative wound before closure. The primary end point was surgical site infection within 30 postoperative days according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition. Among the 689 patients included, 402 were male and 287 were female. The median (range) age was 65.9 (18.5-94.9) years. Participants were randomized to either wound irrigation with polyhexanide (n = 292), saline (n = 295), or no irrigation (n = 102). The procedures were classified as clean contaminated in 92 cases (8%). The surgical site infection incidence was 11.8% overall (81 of 689), 10.6% in the polyhexanide arm (31 of 292), 12.5% in the saline arm (37 of 295), and 12.8% in the no irrigation arm (13 of 102). Irrigation with polyhexanide was not statistically superior to no irrigation or saline irrigation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% CI, 0.64-2.36 vs HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.74-1.94; P = .47). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ among the 3 groups. In this study, intraoperative wound irrigation with polyhexanide solution did not reduce surgical site infection incidence in clean-contaminated open abdominal surgical procedures compared to saline or no irrigation. More clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the potential benefit in contaminated and septic procedures, including the emergency setting. drks.de Identifier: DRKS00012251.

Efficacy of 24 hours versus 5 days of prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of surgical site infection in outpatient elective facial plastic surgery

BackgroundThe discovery of penicillin marked a paradigm shift in medicine with the ability to treat previously life-threatening infections. Increasing antibiotic resistance as well as the risk of adverse reactions to antibiotics, however, creates pressures for judicious use. There continues to be debate about the role of prophylactic antibiotics in facial plastic surgery. This study explores the role of prophylactic antibiotic administration in elective outpatient facial plastic surgery by comparing 5 days versus 24 hours of antibiotic prophylaxis. MethodA retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients undergoing cosmetic procedures at an outpatient facial plastic surgical center who received either 5 days or 24 hours of prophylactic antibiotics was performed. The primary outcome was the need for postoperative antibiotics within 6 weeks of surgery. Results204 patients met the inclusion criteria: 104 in the 5-day group and 100 in the 24-hour prophylaxis group. The overall infection rate was 3.4%: 3% in the 24-hour group and 3.8% in the 5-day group (p = 0.77). Subgroup analysis of clean-contaminated cases (n = 85) showed the rate of postoperative infections was 4.3%, all within the 5-day group. In clean cases (n = 119), the rate of postoperative infections was 4.2% (n = 5): 4.8% (n = 3) in the 24-hour group versus 3.5% (n = 2) in the 5-day group. ConclusionsThe results show that decreasing the duration of antibiotics was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection. Given that antibiotics are an increasingly precious commodity with rising rates of resistance, this study supports the use of decreasing postoperative antibiotics to 24 hours.

Evaluating the effectiveness of proactive perioperative nursing strategies on the prevention of surgical site infections and the enhancement of skin healing in paediatric abdominal surgery

AbstractThe present study aimed to investigate the comparative efficacy of proactive perioperative nursing interventions versus conventional perioperative nursing care in improving wound healing, reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) and enhancing patient satisfaction among paediatric patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery. A total of 100 paediatric patients were enrolled in a randomised controlled trial at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Inclusion criteria were patients aged &lt;18 years who met the requirements for surgical intervention and had no contraindications to surgery or anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to either an observation group receiving proactive perioperative nursing care, or a control group subjected to conventional care. Primary outcome measures included surgical incision healing grades (A, B, C), infection rates confirmed by bacterial culture within 30 days post‐surgery, patient satisfaction scores and length of hospital stay. Comprehensive statistical analyses were performed using IBM's SPSS software (version 27.0). Both groups demonstrated statistically similar baseline demographics and surgical parameters. However, the observation group showed significant improvement in wound healing outcomes (Grade A) and decreased incidence of complications (Grade C) and infections compared to the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the observation group, with 80% of patients reporting satisfaction as opposed to 20% in the control group (p &lt; 0.05). The distribution of pathogenic bacteria in SSIs predominantly included Escherichia coli (E. coli), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Proactive perioperative nursing interventions demonstrate considerable benefits in improving wound healing, reducing surgical site infection rates and enhancing patient satisfaction in elective open abdominal surgery settings. However, these results require validation through large‐scale trials.

Decreasing post hysterectomy surgical site infections with the implementation of a hysterectomy-specific bundle

Surgical site infections (SSI) are a common complication of hysterectomy. Surgical bundles have been shown to reduce SSIs. Here we describe a bundle that was used to combat an abnormal rise in SSI events that resulted in a greater than 75% reduction at our institution. A hysterectomy-specific bundle was developed based on prior success of SSI prevention bundles. Development involved longitudinal education and training to ensure accuracy and compliance. All inpatient abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed at a tertiary referral center were included. The pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention periods were each one year in length. SSI rates were peer-reviewed monthly and overall trends were tracked, including compliance to bundle guidelines. Pre-intervention, an abnormal rise in SSI was identified at 3.76%. During the intervention, 309 inpatient hysterectomies were completed. In this period, six post-hysterectomy SSI events occurred (3.76% vs 1.94%, p=0.21). Four SSIs followed laparotomy and two followed laparoscopy. Compliance during the intervention period ranged from 79-89% with a mean of 85%. In the post-intervention period, there were six SSI following 689 hysterectomies (3.76% vs 0.87%, p=0.004). The majority of SSI occurred after abdominal hysterectomy. Implementation of a hysterectomy-specific surgical bundle allowed for a significant reduction in post-hysterectomy SSI during a yearlong intervention period and a sustained, further reduction in the post-intervention period.

Are changes in antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations responsible for an increased risk of cefazolin allergy?

BackgroundThe first line of prevention of surgical site infection relies on the timely administration of antibiotic prophylaxis. First- and second-generation cephalosporins are the most recommended antibiotics in elective surgery. The incidence of cefazolin allergy has increased worldwide over the years. The sensitization mechanism of cefazolin is currently unknown, and data supporting cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins are lacking. Sensitization could occur through previous exposure either to cefazolin or to structurally related chemical agents. The objective of this study was to evaluate sensitization agents towards cefazolin. MethodsThe OpenBabel chemoinformatics toolbox was used to search for similarities between cefazolin and other molecules in an extensive drug database. Using the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold, we selected drugs with the most similar structure to that of cefazolin. Exposure to those drugs and cefazolin was assessed in a cohort of patients with skin test-proven cefazolin allergy at a specialized allergy centre via a self-administered anonymous questionnaire. ResultsUsing the pholcodine-rocuronium similarity score as a threshold (score≥0.7), 42 molecules were found to be similar to cefazolin (all cephalosporins). Only 8 were marketed in France. None of the 14 cefazolin-allergic patients who answered the questionnaire (65% female, median age 56 years) reported exposure to any identified antibiotics. In contrast, 11 (78%) had at least one previous surgery requiring cefazolin before the index case. ConclusionDirect previous cefazolin exposure was identified in 78% of cefazolin-allergic patients. Cefazolin started to take a central place in antibiotic prophylaxis after 2010, when cefamandole usage decreased drastically. Changes in antibiotic prophylaxis over the past 14 years in France could have been the turning point for the increased incidence of cefazolin allergy.

Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A Proposal for a Global Evidence-Based Bundle.

In the multimodal strategy context, to implement healthcare-associated infection prevention, bundles are one of the most commonly used methods to adapt guidelines in the local context and transfer best practices into routine clinical care. One of the most important measures to prevent surgical site infections is surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). This narrative review aims to present a bundle for the correct SAP administration and evaluate the evidence supporting it. Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention guidelines published by the WHO, CDC, NICE, and SHEA/IDSA/APIC/AHA, and the clinical practice guidelines for SAP by ASHP/IDSA/SIS/SHEA, were reviewed. Subsequently, comprehensive searches were also conducted using the PubMed®/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, in order to identify further supporting evidence-based documentation. The bundle includes five different measures that may affect proper SAP administration. The measures included may be easily implemented in all hospitals worldwide and are based on minimal drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics knowledge, which all surgeons should know. Antibiotics for SAP should be prescribed for surgical procedures at high risk for SSIs, such as clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical procedures or for clean surgical procedures where SSIs, even if unlikely, may have devastating consequences, such as in procedures with prosthetic implants. SAP should generally be administered within 60 min before the surgical incision for most antibiotics (including cefazolin). SAP redosing is indicated for surgical procedures exceeding two antibiotic half-lives or for procedures significantly associated with blood loss. In principle, SAP should be discontinued after the surgical procedure. Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programmes can optimise the treatment of infections and reduce adverse events associated with antibiotics. In the context of a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach, it is essential to encourage an institutional safety culture in which surgeons are persuaded, rather than compelled, to respect antibiotic prescribing practices. In that context, the proposed bundle contains a set of evidence-based interventions for SAP administration. It is easy to apply, promotes collaboration, and includes measures that can be adequately followed and evaluated in all hospitals worldwide.

A case series of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy use with purse-string closure in stoma closure wounds in infants

BackgroundThe study introduces the application of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in pediatric stoma closure, emphasizing the importance of enhancing aesthetics and minimizing surgical site infections (SSI).Case presentationThe case series involves four infants undergoing non-umbilical stoma closure with a combination of purse-string closure (PSC) and NPWT, focusing on aesthetic outcomes and infection prevention. NPWT was initiated immediately after surgery, and patients were monitored every 3–4 days. Notably, none of the four infants experienced SSI or other complications. The patients adequately tolerated NPWT, with no significant adverse events. Furthermore, Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) was 9 [7–10], and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) (observer) was 12.5 [12–19], POSAS (patient) was 12.5 [11–16] (all median values [minimum–maximum]), indicating that excellent aesthetic outcomes were achieved.DiscussionWe emphasizes the significance of aesthetics in pediatric patients; in addition, our findings demonstrate that four infants who received NPWT combined with PSC achieved superior outcomes that did the most recent four infants who underwent PSC only at our institution. It also addresses the risk of SSI in stoma closure and discusses the pros and potential cons of using NPWT in pediatric cases, underlining the need for further research and the accumulation of additional reports.ConclusionsThis is the inaugural report of prophylactic NPWT for pediatric stoma closure, emphasizing the effectiveness of combining PSC and NPWT for SSI prevention and improved aesthetics. The study calls for additional research and reports on NPWT in pediatric cases to further solidify its benefits in this patient population.